University policy

Based on the policy of GenAI usage, here's a detailed summary of the main policies and approaches to generative AI across top 100 universities (based on the ARWU ranking).

Policies

General Stance

Most universities recognize the potential of AI to enhance learning, teaching, and research.
They encourage responsible and ethical use of AI tools.
Many emphasize the need for transparency when using AI.

Use in Coursework

Policies often vary by course, discipline, and instructor.
Common approaches include:
a) Prohibiting AI use without explicit permission
b) Allowing limited use with proper acknowledgment
c) Encouraging AI use as a learning tool

Academic Integrity

Submitting AI-generated work without acknowledgment is generally considered academic misconduct.
Students are typically held responsible for the accuracy and integrity of their work, even if AI-assisted.
Many universities require students to disclose AI use in their assignments.

Citation and Acknowledgmen

When AI use is permitted, students are often required to cite or acknowledge it.
Some universities provide specific guidelines on how to cite AI tools.

Data Privacy and Security

Many universities caution against inputting sensitive or confidential information into public AI tools.
Some provide approved AI platforms for handling university data.

AI Literacy

Many universities are developing programs to educate students and faculty on AI use.
This includes understanding AI's capabilities, limitations, and potential biases.

Assessment Design

Instructors are encouraged to design assignments that can't be fully completed by AI alone.
Focus on higher-order thinking skills and process-based assessments.

AI Detection

Many universities caution against over-reliance on AI detection tools due to high false-positive rates.
Some advise against using these tools as the sole basis for academic misconduct accusations.

Research Use

Generally, AI use in research is allowed but must be disclosed.
Researchers are responsible for verifying AI-generated content.
AI tools are not considered authors on academic papers.

Institutional AI Tools

Some universities provide their own AI tools or approved platforms for student and faculty use.

Equity Considerations

Some policies address the need to ensure equal access to AI tools for all students.

Continuous Policy Evolution

Many universities acknowledge that their AI policies will need regular updates as the technology evolves.

Discipline-Specific Approaches

Some universities allow individual departments or faculties to set more specific AI use guidelines.

AI in Grading

It can be used for exams with objective answers (multiple choice exams).
The use of AI in grading, generally requires human oversight and final approval.
Instructors take the responsibility.

Copyright and Intellectual Property

Many policies remind users to respect copyright when using AI, especially when inputting course materials.

Examination Policies

AI use is typically prohibited in examinations unless explicitly allowed.

Note

This is just a summary of the school policy of GenAI usage. It may help you to decide your usage of GenAI. However, you may consult your own school for a specific case. Also, please refer to each university's policy for detailed information.

Generative AI for Research Initiative